top of page

Search Results

172 results found with an empty search

  • Much Much Spectrum | Ableist magazine covers: A look through time

    How bad media representation of disability fuels stereotypes and excludes disabled voices < Back News, Disability Ableist magazine covers: A look through time How bad media representation of disability fuels stereotypes and excludes disabled voices MMS Staff 6 Jul 2024 4-min read That ableism - a term whose literal meaning is discrimination against people with disabilities - is deeply embedded in our society is no unknown fact. But when it rears its ugly head through mass media, and in the form of magazine covers no less, ableist attitudes are further perpetuated, making life even more difficult for those with disabilities and illnesses. Over the years, many magazines have carried brazenly ableist covers, enraging and prompting pushback by disability activists. This article is a collection of instances when our media has been supremely (and shamelessly) ableist. Instances of ableist magazine and newspaper covers through history Time Magazine (2003): Time Magazine ran a cover titled “Overcoming Dyslexia,” spreading gross misinformation about learning disabilities. The term “overcoming” implies that dyslexia is something to be conquered, rather than a difference to be understood and accommodated. This is especially wrong considering affirming language is crucial in shaping perceptions and attitudes towards disabilities and neurodivergent conditions. Interview Magazine (2015): In 2015, supermodel-entrepreneur Kylie Jenner was criticised for a photoshoot in Interview Magazine where she posed in a wheelchair. Disabled individuals and advocates found this use of a wheelchair as a fashion prop deeply offensive. Beth Grossman, Head of Policy at the disability charity Scope, remarked, “Having a non-disabled person in a wheelchair, as a provocative fashion prop, will offend many disabled people. It’s rare that we see aspirational and authentic reflections of disabled people in advertising and the media.” The Economist (2016): The Economist's April 2016 cover titled “Beautiful Minds, Wasted” was another egregious instance of blatant ableism perpetuated by mass media. Not only did the headline suggest autistic minds are wasted, the inappropriate puzzle piece depiction insinuated that autistic people are 'broken', need 'fixing', or complex beings who can't be 'figured out'. Patronising autistic people by using the ableist phrase "Beautiful Minds, Wasted" shows how even big, global publications don't make the effort to understand autism from a neurodiversity-affirming perspective. The failure to consult with autistic people and include their perspectives in the story was a significant oversight. The New Yorker (2023): The New Yorker stirred controversy with a cover featuring US political leaders using walkers. The cartoon depicted Donald Trump, Mitch McConnell, Nancy Pelosi, and Joe Biden as frail and elderly, using mobility aids they do not actually need. This portrayal was criticised for its ageist and ableist implications, suggesting that age and the use of mobility aids diminish one’s capabilities. The Economist (2024): And the Economist, astonishingly, did it once again with their July 4 cover attacking President Joe Biden, depicting him as a “befuddled old man” using a zimmer frame branded with the presidential seal. This imagery sparked widespread outrage for its ableist undertones, suggesting that mobility aid use equates to unfitness for leadership. Catarina Rivera, a prominent disability advocate, expressed her dismay on LinkedIn: “This week's The Economist cover is ableist, disgraceful, and deeply offensive. It suggests that someone who uses a walker as a mobility aid is unfit to run the country. Disabled people are very capable of leadership — period (not 'despite' our disabilities, just exactly as we are). Using a mobility aid isn't something that's shameful or that makes someone unfit for leadership.” Heather Thompson, another advocate, shared her personal struggle with internalised ableism: “I used to hate my walker; I struggled with my own internalised ableism every time I needed to use the walker in public. What would people think? Your magazine cover validates my fears by normalising these false beliefs. A walker does not represent decline, nor is it synonymous with intellectual weakness.” Julia M, an able-bodied elder, condemned the cover for its harmful implications: “This is the most insulting, discriminatory, ableist cover for a major publication that I can remember. As an able-bodied elder, I condemn this harmful, ageist, and slanderous artwork. This is trash.” These voices highlight the broader impact of such representations, which extend beyond the individual to affect the entire disabled community. The harm of ableist depictions Ableist depictions in the media do undeniable harm. Ableist behaviours, notions and attitudes encourage stereotypes, reinforce bias, and marginalise disabled individuals. When disability is used as an insult or a symbol of incompetence, it results in a culture of exclusion and discrimination. Ableist representations of disability and neurodivergence also contribute to internalised ableism among individuals with these lived experiences, resulting in shame and self-stigma due to negative societal attitudes. Disability advocates emphasise the importance of accurate, respectful representations in the media. As Catarina Rivera pointed out, “Let's not forget that FDR (Franklin D Roosevelt) was a disabled president and a wheelchair user. The impact of this cover extends beyond The Economist itself.” Ongoing instances of ableist behaviours in various institutions and the media highlights the need for continuous advocacy and education. As Heather Thompson said, “Some of the greatest courage I’ve witnessed has come from those stepping into a walker and taking their fierce first steps.” Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

  • Much Much Spectrum | NYPD swears in one of its first deaf interns

    Heriberto Almonte, resident of Brooklyn, will assist officers with outreach & engagement efforts < Back Disability, News, Work NYPD swears in one of its first deaf interns Heriberto Almonte, resident of Brooklyn, will assist officers with outreach & engagement efforts MMS Staff 14 Jul 2024 1-min read The New York Police Department (NYPD) swore in one of its first deaf interns on Friday, June 12. Heriberto Almonte - a college student - will be assigned to NYPD Community Affairs, where he will be assisting with the development of an outreach and engagement plan for the deaf and hard of hearing community. Almonte will be tasked with helping officers understand what it’s like to interact with the D/ deaf community. A resident of Brooklyn, Almonte first came to the United States when he was 12. That was also when he learnt and started communicating in sign language. “If it wasn’t for the NYPD or the education that I received, I wouldn’t feel confident. I wouldn’t receive the knowledge that I have today,” Almonte signed at his swearing-in ceremony. Prior to moving to the United States, Almonte lived in the Dominican Republic where, he added, there were no schools that understood and accommodated his needs. Almonte’s internship lasts up to 13 weeks, post which Almonte plans to continue working with the d/ Deaf community. Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

  • Much Much Spectrum | Paris Hilton, AOC push DEFIANCE Act against AI deepfakes

    As Grok “undressing” spreads, Hilton and Ocasio-Cortez urge Congress to allow survivors to sue < Back Gender, Media, News Paris Hilton, AOC push DEFIANCE Act against AI deepfakes As Grok “undressing” spreads, Hilton and Ocasio-Cortez urge Congress to allow survivors to sue MMS Staff 28 Jan 2026 4-min read Grok AI is being used to digitally undress women and children, and despite public pledges to suspend the feature, investigators and journalists have confirmed that it continues to power the creation of non-consensual sexualised images of real people, women, girls. In some cases, images appear to involve minors. What’s actually happening on Grok On Grok, users have been uploading photos of real women and children, some as young as 10, prompting the AI to “remove their clothes.” The results are hypersexualised deepfakes, edited into bikinis, lingerie, porn-like poses, sometimes with fake filters meant to simulate bodily fluids. Between December 25, 2025 and January 1, 2026, AI Forensics tracked over 20,000 images generated using this tool. More than half showed women in “minimal clothing.” At least 2% appeared to include minors, some reportedly as young as toddlers.They were real individuals, digitally altered, and their images circulated without permission. The scale is new Non-consensual deepfake pornography has always disproportionately targeted women. Studies consistently show that over 96% of non-consensual AI-generated sexual content features female victims. What’s changed is speed and scale. AI has made this kind of abuse faster, cheaper, and harder to trace. What once required technical expertise can now be done with a single prompt and a photo pulled from social media. The violence may be digital, but the harm is intimate and enduring, especially for women, girls, and children. Victims have spoken about discovering deepfake images of themselves years after the original photos were taken. Some images are edited to make women appear younger. One survivor found sexualised images of her 14-year-old self circulating online. These images are used for ridicule, coercion, revenge, and blackmail. They are part of a long, familiar pattern of hidden cameras, revenge porn, and leaked videos, now re-engineered through AI. Governments are scrambling to respond. The UK’s communications regulator Ofcom has contacted the platform. The European Union has said it is “very seriously” investigating. France and India are tracking complaints and potential violations. In countries like the UK, laws already exist that criminalise non-consensual deepfakes, especially those involving children. Feminist campaigners fought hard to push those laws through. Yet survivors remain unprotected in practice, stuck in systems that prioritise corporate damage control over human safety. Grok’s response so far has been telling. The tool was moved behind a paywall, as if charging for access counts as a safety measure. A public statement about “urgent fixes” was reportedly generated by AI itself. Naming the harm matters This is tech-enabled sexual violence. It’s what happens when patriarchy gets re-coded into algorithms, fed by engagement metrics, and shielded by corporate language about innovation. When consent is optional in digital spaces, women’s bodies become endlessly reusable, scraped, altered, monetised. From “scandal” to accountability: Why lawmakers are stepping in On January 22, 2026, Paris Hilton walked into Capitol Hill alongside US representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez united by a demand that feels basic but radical in practice: make AI deepfake abuse legally actionable. They were there to push the DEFIANCE Act, legislation that would give survivors the civil right to sue people who knowingly create and distribute non-consensual AI-generated intimate images. That one word, sue, changes everything. Unlike takedown-focused laws such as the TAKE IT DOWN Act, the DEFIANCE Act is about consequences. It moves survivors out of a “report and pray” system and into one where harm carries real legal and financial cost. The bill has rare bipartisan backing, with Laurel Lee as the Republican co-lead and Senators Dick Durbin and Lindsey Graham supporting the push. The decision to bring it to a vote rests with Mike Johnson, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives. At its core, the bill asks a simple question: will consent online be enforceable, or will it remain a suggestion? Paris Hilton on rewriting the narrative Hilton’s presence matters because of what she represents. When an intimate video of her was distributed without consent at age 19, it was framed as a “scandal.” She has spent years insisting on a different word: abuse. “Scandal” blames the woman for being seen. “Abuse” names the violation, and the systems that enabled it. It reframes shame as something that belongs to perpetrators, platforms, and cultures that profit from humiliation. Why deepfake abuse works Deepfake pornography thrives because it weaponises social punishment. The image may be digital, but the consequences are brutally physical: fear, isolation, lost jobs, damaged reputations, teenagers switching schools, and women shrinking their lives to avoid being “made an example of.” This happens in a world where violence against women is already normalised. According to the World Health Organization, nearly 1 in 3 women globally experience physical and/ or sexual violence in their lifetime. So when people dismiss deepfakes as “just online,” they ignore the truth. That digital abuse plugs directly into offline inequality, and amplifies it. Why this moment matters The DEFIANCE Act matters because it treats non-consensual deepfakes for what they are: image-based sexual abuse. And it gives survivors leverage. If the cost of violating women remains low, this abuse will keep scaling. If the cost rises - legally, financially, socially - the business model breaks. That’s what accountability looks like. We were told AI would make life easier. Instead, we’re watching it replicate the oldest forms of harm at unprecedented speed. What’s at stake here is dignity. And it’s whether lawmakers, platforms, and the public are willing to say, clearly, that sexual violence doesn’t become acceptable just because it’s automated. And if this story makes you uncomfortable, that’s the point. Because silence is what lets systems like this grow, and real, enforceable accountability, is the only thing that stops them. Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

  • Much Much Spectrum | Being atypical isn’t a deficit: My Neuroqueer identity

    Exploring the intersection of gender, sexuality, and neurodivergence where fluidity and individuality thrive < Back Neurodiversity, Gender, LGBTQIA+ Being atypical isn’t a deficit: My Neuroqueer identity Exploring the intersection of gender, sexuality, and neurodivergence where fluidity and individuality thrive Soumya Mishra 28 Jul 2024 5-min read A few years back when I attended a workshop, one of my fellow participants addressed me by “they” pronoun, and I felt incredibly seen at that moment. Up until then, I was internally struggling to accept the non-binary messiness of gender, even though growing up I have had plenty of instances when I felt like a square peg being forced into a round hole situation. When it comes to discourses around gender, sexuality or neurodivergence, we often come across the word “spectrum.” The idea behind “spectrum” is that it encompasses a range of understandings, views and opinions on these subjects. But what if, instead of a range, it was a vast universe where everyone could be whatever they wanted? Each individual is a unique star and can be their most authentic self here. That’s what the neuroqueer space means to me. My relationship with gender, sexuality and neurodivergence is deeply neuroqueer. The neuroqueer space is a radical space where non-conformist notions concerning gender, sexuality and neurodivergence are celebrated, which is in contrast to a world where cis-heteronormativity and neuronormativity are enforced. Being neurodivergent means seeing and interacting with the world in atypical ways. And since neurodivergence affects how I see and interact with the world, it has also shaped my understanding of gender and sexuality. Usually, gender identity is constructed from a neurotypical lens, completely disregarding neurodivergent perspectives. However, neurodivergent folx experience a queering of the mind. So neatly defined identity labels based on neurotypical standards such as “boy,” “girl,” “man” and “woman” mean differently to many of us. Even as an adult, there are parts of me that are more childlike than others around me. This entails how I experience and express my feelings, my innate curiosity or whimsical behaviour. And this has invited comments and infantilisation from those around me. For instance, I’m often told I seem much younger than my age because my behaviour doesn’t coincide with what is considered age-appropriate. So from my neuroqueer perspective, even the construction of cis-gender identity is complex, and sometimes, it is closer to the idea of queerness as it defies what is perceived as “normal.” Now, while I started using “she/ they” pronouns initially to be more inclusive and break the gender binary, overtime it has become more than that. “They” can be both singular and plural; it’s fluid. I’m an individual whose identity has been shaped by numerous experiences, which can be truly understood by understanding the context. To me, “she/ they” makes room for all that and more. So even though I’ve been socialised as a “woman,” there are moments when I feel the term does not encapsulate all my feelings. As neuroqueerness celebrates fluidity, it has given me the space to explore the idea of gender away from neurotypicality. In addition, by virtue of my asexuality, I experience little to no sexual attraction. But I’m romantically attracted towards two or more genders, which is atypical in this allonormative society that reinforces compulsory sexuality and heteronormativity. My asexuality requires no “fixing.” Like my neurodivergence, my asexuality, too, subverts the normative culture, but both of them are described in terms of “lacks.” While asexuality is commonly described as an absence of sexual attraction, neurodivergence is defined as having social impairments. But, being atypical isn’t a deficit. Feminist theorist Bell Hooks wrote: “‘Queer’ not as being about who you’re having sex with (that can be a dimension of it); but ‘queer’ as being about the self that is at odds with everything around it and that has to invent and create and find a place to speak and to thrive and to live.” Building on her argument around queerness, when queer theory and the neurodiversity paradigm inform one another, there is a further queering of the body and the mind. In this resulting transformative space, which is the neuroqueer space, normative understanding of gender, sexuality and neurodivergence can be challenged. My neuroqueer bodymind isn’t fixed or singular, nor does it exist in a vacuum. It has been shaped by numerous experiences and can only be understood by situating my experiences contextually. In their book Authoring Autism, M Remi Yergeau eloquently argues, “Neuroqueering signifies a generous and inter-bodily gesturing, one that postures beyond brains, bones, and dermis; one that waves in a plurality of identities, orientations, affective stances, and lived experiences, modes ranging from autism to deafness to trauma to asexuality.” Simply put, to me, neuroqueering is resisting neatly defined categories and creating a space where even the messier parts of myself can thrive without giving in to binaries. Neuroqueerness problematises neat identity labels, making room for fluidity and plurality of identities, orientations and lived experiences by disrupting cis-heteronormativity and neuronormativity as well as defying societal expectations around what is considered “normal” and “abnormal.” My lived experiences and the journey I’ve undertaken to reach here are complex and difficult to disentangle from one another. “Neuroqueer” is all-encompassing without restrictive labels and diagnoses. It’s a space where I can make sense of my neuroqueer bodymind, connect with folx who’ve similar lived realities, and be a part of a community to experience a sense of belongingness. Glossary: Neuroqueer - It is both an identity and a verb. An individual who diverges from dominant societal norms, considers them to be neurologically queer, rejecting normative ideas around gender, sexuality and neurocognitive functioning. Neuronormativity - Upholding a set of rules, values and ideas around neuro-cognitive functioning which suggest that certain types of behaviour are normal, while others are not. Cis-heteronormativity - The idea that being cis-gender and heterosexual is the norm and such people are superior in society. Neurotypicality - The state of not being associated with neurodivergent behaviours. Asexuality - A type of sexual orientation wherein people experience little to no sexual attraction towards others, but may or may not engage in sexual activity. Allonormative - The idea that all human beings experience sexual and romantic attraction, and that’s the norm. Soumya Mishra (she/ they) is a neuroqueer development sector professional with over 6 years of work experience, who is primarily interested in leveraging digital mediums to amplify marginalised voices, bridge existing gaps, promote inclusivity and accessibility. Their work and approaches are informed by their lived experiences. Building a community and fostering a sense of belongingness have been crucial in Soumya's work approach. As a personal project, they're also building a podcast — Atypical Dikkatein — to chronicle the stories of queer-disabled folx in India as these stories are often relegated to the margins. Follow Soumya on LinkedIn Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

  • Much Much Spectrum | No mention of disability in budget 2024 speech

    Union Budget 24 announced yesterday saw an increase of only 0.025 percent in funds allocated to DEPwD < Back Disability, News No mention of disability in budget 2024 speech Union Budget 24 announced yesterday saw an increase of only 0.025 percent in funds allocated to DEPwD MMS Staff 24 Jul 2024 3-min read The Union Budget 2025 was presented by the Finance Minister of India, Nirmala Sitharaman, yesterday, and left the country’s disabled community high and dry yet again. According to the PTI , the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities (DEPwD) was allocated Rs 1,225.27 crore, a marginal increase from the previous year’s 1,225.01 crore. While disability activists were campaigning for at least a 5 percent allocation of the total union budget to the DEPwD, the current figures park the tally at a mere 0.025 percent of the total national budget for FY 2024-25. The figures add up to a Rs 12 lakh (USD 14,000) increase from last year’s total allocation. A substantial portion of the budget, amounting to Rs 615.33 crore, has been allocated to the National Program for the Welfare of Persons with Disabilities for this fiscal year. This despite the government outlining employment and skilling and social justice as two of the priority areas in the year’s budget. The Politics and Disability Forum put out a post on LinkedIn highlighting the disproportionately small share of the union budget allocated to the DEPwD given the large population of the country. “An analysis of specific allocation reveals further complications with this budget wherein the allocation for Scheme for Implementation of Person With Disabilities Act (SIPDA) has seen systematic decline over the years,” their post read. Disability rights groups and self-advocates, too, voiced their displeasure openly. “Over the years, I have always felt disappointed and spoken against the token mention of disability in budget speeches. This time, the Hon’ble Finance Minister took me too seriously. Disability wasn’t mentioned even once in the budget speech,” said disability rights advocate Nipun Malhotra in a post on LinkedIn. Dr Satendra Singh, disability rights activist, tweeted sarcastically, “Bravo, #Budget2024 ! Inclusive growth by completely forgetting people with disabilities, not even mentioning them once and giving a generous 0.025% of the budget to @socialpwds for our empowerment. Truly redefining #SocialJustice !” “Flagship programs like the Accessible India campaign are underfunded, resulting in missed targets and compromised accessibility. Reduced allocations for the Scheme for the Implementation of Persons with Disabilities Act (SIPDA) make the situation worse.,” wrote Danish Mahajan, founder of Radio Udaan, in a post on LinkedIn. The Scheme for the Implementation of Persons with Disabilities Act (SIPDA) has seen a decrease in budget allocation compared to the last fiscal. The National Platform for the Rights of the Disabled (NPRD) general secretary Muralidharan noted the reduction in support to autonomous bodies such as the National Institutes and the Rehabilitation Council of India, which play crucial roles in rehabilitation and education. He also highlighted the cut in scholarships for students with disabilities, which could force many to PwDs drop out of education. The release put out by the Politics and Disability Forum highlights the consistent underutilisation of allocated budget funds by the DEPwD. “The absence of Persons with Disabilities from this social justice dents the promise of inclusive growth towards Viksit Bharat 2047. A developed India without catering to its 7-8 percent of its population (sic) will only cause marginalisation of this minority,” the release read. The organisation has asked for increased investment in health insurance schemes for PwDs, specific budget allocations for disability across ministries, high-quality assistive aids, uniform state disability pensions, and long-term skill development programmes. Social sector highlights from Budget 2024-25: Youth Employment: ₹2 lakh crore allocated for job creation Agriculture: ₹1.52 lakh crore for agricultural development Women Empowerment: ₹3 lakh crore for women-focused schemes Urban Development: ₹10 lakh crore for housing and infrastructure Climate Resilience: Introduction of climate-resilient crops and new schemes Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

  • Much Much Spectrum | Coldplay’s new single ft sign language wins hearts globally

    Chris Martin and co’s latest “feelslikeimfallinginlove” celebrates love, representation, and environmental responsibility < Back News, Disability, Climate Coldplay’s new single ft sign language wins hearts globally Chris Martin and co’s latest “feelslikeimfallinginlove” celebrates love, representation, and environmental responsibility MMS Staff 4 Jul 2024 4-min read Seems like Coldplay has captured the hearts of millions yet again with their latest single, ‘Feels Like I’m Falling in Love.’ An ode to vulnerability and connection, the song - a Max Martin production - is the first release from Coldplay’s upcoming album Moon Music, set to drop on October 4. A historic setting for a modern message The music video for “feelslikeimfallinginlove” was shot at the ancient Odeon of Herodes Atticus in Athens, Greece. Directed by Ben Mor, who previously collaborated with the band on ‘Hymn For The Weekend’ featuring Beyoncé, the video features a blend of history and modernity. Fans were invited via the band’s social media to witness the shoot, making the experience inclusive and memorable. A step toward sustainability Upon its release, Moon Music will be available in various formats that adhere to new sustainability standards. Each vinyl copy will be made from nine recycled plastic bottles, and the CD version crafted from 90 percent recycled polycarbonate. These efforts are expected to reduce CO2 emissions in production by at least 78 percent and avoid the use of over five metric tonnes of virgin plastic. Representation matters The video for “feelslikeimfallinginlove” stars Natasha Ofili, who is well-known for her role as Principal Karen Vaughn in Ryan Murphy’s Netflix series The Politician. Ofili, who is Deaf, took charge of the video’s story and creative direction, incorporating her own American Sign Language (ASL) interpretation of the song throughout the video. Her performance is further enriched by the participation of Deaf members from the Venezuelan Sign Language section of El Sistema Venezuela’s Coro de Manos Blancas (White Hands Choir), supported by the Dudamel Foundation. One fan commented on their YouTube channel: “One reason why I love Coldplay so much: They make music for everybody.” Another fan wrote: “I’m a sign language teacher and my uncle is profoundly deaf from birth. I’ve grown up signing and have friends that are deaf. This video is so so beautiful and encapsulates the strength and emotion of sign language. Thank you Chris, Johnny, Will and Guy for not only being the best band ever with the most beautiful music, but for also genuinely caring and loving people. I know you guys probably won’t see this but I need you to know how much you’ve impacted my life and supported me through some dark times. You’re not appreciated enough for your talents and big hearts. Love you loads.” A global impact Coldplay frontman Chris Martin recently wowed fans in Singapore by incorporating sign language into his performance. This act of inclusion resonated deeply with the band’s Gen Z fans and sparked a wave of admiration for him across social media platforms. Coldplay’s efforts towards accessibility underscore the importance of representation in entertainment. By engaging with diverse communities and addressing social issues such as disability, the band sets a powerful example for youth worldwide. Add to that their commitment to sustainability, which inspires fans to embrace these values in their own lives. Something more role models need to consider doing. Looking ahead As Coldplay continue their European tour and prepare to headline Glastonbury for a record fifth time, their influence on music and social advocacy seems to be on a steady rise. With Moon Music, the industry is ushering in a new era of conscious creativity, where entertainment meets social responsibility. Watch the video below - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3IVdLo-2NM Lyrics I know that this could hurt me bad I know that this could feel like that But I just can’t stop Let my defences drop I know that I was born to kill Any angel on my windowsill But it’s so dark inside I throw the windows wide I know La-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la I know La-la-la-la-la-la-la-la Still I don’t let go And fields of flowers grow Oh It feels like I’m falling in love Maybe for the first time Baby it’s my mind you blow It feels like I’m falling in love You’re throwing me a lifeline This is for a lifetime, I know I know that in this kind of scene Of two people there’s a spark between One gets torn apart, one gets a broken heart I know La-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la I know La-la-la-la-la-la-la-la Still I don’t let go And fields of flowers grow Oh It feels like I’m falling in love Maybe for the first time Baby it’s my mind you blow Feels like I’m falling in love You’re throwing me a lifeline This is for a lifetime, I know Feels like I’m falling in love You’re throwing me a lifeline Oh now for the first time I know I’m not alone Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

  • Much Much Spectrum | Supreme Court of India drops guide to respectful disability language

    Chief Justice DY Chandrachud is challenging stereotypes to build an inclusive society < Back Disability, News Supreme Court of India drops guide to respectful disability language Chief Justice DY Chandrachud is challenging stereotypes to build an inclusive society MMS Staff 3 Oct 2024 2-min read As a disabled writer, I have witnessed firsthand how language can shape perceptions, attitudes, and ultimately, the treatment of individuals with disabilities. So, when the Supreme Court of India recently launched a handbook to redefine the conversation around disability, my heart swelled with hope. This isn’t just a legal document; it’s a call to action for all of us to rethink how we speak about disability. Chief Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud emphasised the power of language in the courtroom and beyond, stating that stereotypes and biases can subtly influence legal proceedings at the handbook’s unveiling. This resonates deeply with me and countless others who have faced the brunt of misguided assumptions. How often have we been labelled as “brave” or “heroic” merely for existing? It’s time to dismantle these stereotypes and advocate for language that reflects our humanity, not our limitations. The handbook explicitly discourages derogatory terms like “crippled,” “retard,” and “loony.” These words not only belittle our experiences but also contribute to a culture of stigma. In a society that is often quick to judge, it’s crucial to use language that respects our dignity. It’s a reminder that we are individuals first, with unique stories and identities beyond our disabilities. As someone who has navigated the complexities of living with a disability, I find the emphasis on respectful language refreshing. Chief Justice Chandrachud shared his personal experience with his foster daughters, who were born with a genetic condition. His story highlights the journey that comes with understanding disability on a deeper level. It’s about love, purpose, and a commitment to fostering an inclusive society where every child, regardless of their abilities, is cherished. But the handbook isn’t just about what to say or not to say; it addresses a critical gap in our legal system: data collection. The Chief Justice pointed out that the lack of reliable data on children with disabilities, especially those who have experienced abuse or come into conflict with the law, is a significant challenge. Without accurate data, how can we expect to create effective policies that protect and empower disabled individuals? The call for better data collection is a plea for accountability and meaningful reform. This handbook is a powerful tool for change, but it’s not the end of the road. It’s a stepping stone toward a more inclusive society that values every individual. By encouraging legal professionals, policymakers, and everyday citizens to adopt inclusive terminology, we can change the narrative around disability. The language we use can either uplift or diminish our experiences, and it’s time to choose words that uplift. As we move forward, let’s take this opportunity to engage in conversations about disability that are respectful, informed, and compassionate. The Supreme Court’s initiative is a significant leap toward breaking down barriers and fostering understanding. But it’s up to each of us to carry this message forward, ensuring that our words reflect the dignity and complexity of our lives. Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

  • Much Much Spectrum | If you’re thinking of disclosing your autism, read this first

    The global autistic community shares the good and bad sides of autism disclosure < Back Neurodiversity, Community If you’re thinking of disclosing your autism, read this first The global autistic community shares the good and bad sides of autism disclosure MMS Staff 5 Jul 2024 5-min read An autism disclosure can be freeing. But, undoubtedly, it's also often a delicate and challenging process for many autistic individuals. Despite increasing awareness and understanding of autism, the responses that autistic people receive when they share their diagnosis can range from dismissive and ignorant to outright ableist. Our recent #MuchMuchSays session - where we ask our community questions related to topics that pertain to our everyday lives - with the autistic community highlighted the varied and often painful reactions that autistic individuals face when they disclose their autism. Common responses to Autism disclosure One of the most common and frustrating responses reported was a dismissive or reaction of disbelief. Many people shared experiences of being told they don't “look” autistic or that there's no way they could be autistic: You look normal - @1232343_ You don't look autistic to me is usually the first thing I get. - @yagamilight3000 These comments reflect a fundamental misunderstanding of autism, reducing it to a set of visible traits. Silence and dismissal Equally hurtful is the silence or abrupt change in subject that some individuals face after disclosing their autism: Nothing. Silence. No questions. Nothing said. Maybe some generic normative statements. Changing the subject. That’s the saddest. Then autie brain can’t even understand if the other person is interested in knowing more or being more supportive or is it that typical way of going quiet to dismiss something out of the conversation (this way is of course taken from that super cryptic rules and regulations book of neuronormativity which no neurodivergent has been able to fully decipher yet). - @adwaita.das Silence from the two friends closest to me. It broke my heart 😔 - @sara.untangled Usually something dismissive like, ‘only a little though right (assuming spectrum is a left to right-low to high)’ and then, ‘oh we all struggle with those things’… - @cotey72 This lack of engagement can be deeply isolating, leaving autistic individuals feeling unsupported and marginalised. Ignorant and hurtful questions Some responses are more overtly offensive or ignorant, questioning the legitimacy of the diagnosis or making inappropriate assumptions. Worst response: who assessed you? There’s no way you are autistic. - @carotomes I get a “Oh! I’m sorry!” Or “Sooo, self diagnosed huh?” - @twistedlavenderbud I’ve gotten questions like “you must be really high functioning then, right?” Because they can’t believe I have a job and am able to socialize with them. - @livloudesu A judge told me I seemed cognitive. Yeah thanks judge it's called masking. - @catehernandez88 “I think we are all a bit autistic aren't we?” - @willowthewisp1 These reactions not only invalidate the individual's experience but also undermine their credibility and self-awareness. Ableist microaggressions Ableism often manifests in the form of microaggressions — subtle, often unintentional, discriminatory comments or behaviours. Some community members shared their experiences with these types of responses: "Are you actually diagnosed?" But most of the time people don't ASK anything, they TELL. "You're really high functioning then", "you don't seem autistic", "don't let it define you!", "you just want an excuse", "but you can (insert stereotype here)"... - @autistic.since.forever “BUT you never struggled with that as a kid.” “buT you got all As in school” “why are you suddenly struggling with all this stuff NOW?” - @_beansproot These comments not only diminish the reality of living with autism but also perpetuate stereotypes about the “spectrum” being a linear scale. Positive and supportive reactions But all's not lost. While negative responses are unfortunately common, there are also examples of understanding and supportive reactions. I instantly disclose once I realize I will talk with them for more than about 10 minutes. It’s a casual disclosure and I decide how long the conversation will go once I see their reaction. My favorite reaction to date: “…. You are? Wow…. We are so much alike. I’ve been really thinking I might be too… can you tell me how you sought your diagnosis and how you deal with everything being too much?” - @neurodivvyd 'please let me know if you need any accommodations or things I can do to be supportive' - @laurart_uk “cool/good to know! Thanks for sharing that with me! Optional: I know every autistic person is different, so Is there anything you want me to know about your specific needs?” - @_beansproot These supportive responses show empathy and a willingness to learn. Filtering out ableism When it comes to disclosing autism, negative reactions can be disheartening. However, it helps to filter out those who are not supportive or understanding. This process can help autistic individuals cultivate a smaller, more supportive social circle, free from ableism and negativity. Negative or dismissive reactions serve as indicators of relationships that may not be worth maintaining. People who respond with disbelief, silence, or hurtful comments reveal their inability to be supportive allies. By recognising and distancing themselves from these individuals, autistic people can protect their mental and emotional well-being. Identifying the true allies Disclosing autism can act as a litmus test for the relationships in one's life. Those who respond with empathy, curiosity, and a willingness to understand are the true allies. They demonstrate their acceptance and support through their words and actions, making it clear that they value and respect the autistic individual's identity. I take the “tell every stranger within 10 seconds of meeting” and then the folk who don't like it never talk to me again. It's a win-win for me. I'm very vocal about ppl being rude to me so if there's rudeness pointed at me I call it out. Usually I disclose in response to them disclosing something. If they get rude at me about autism I get rude about their disclosure. 😂on a more serious note: my job is focused on hiring folk with disabilities, mental or physical, so I'm unmasked there. I'm unmasked in my social circle, and I live with other ND ppl. I honestly haven't gotten a ride response in several years. Not since I moved out of the American Midwest tbh. - @thegriffinnews The importance of kindness and acceptance Autism disclosure can be a slippery slope, often leading to overt bullying, discrimination, or social isolation. The responses shared by our community highlight the urgent need for greater awareness, education, and kindness. By cultivating an environment of acceptance and understanding, we can help autistic individuals feel seen, heard, and valued. Moving forward It is crucial for society to move beyond stereotypes and misconceptions about autism. Simple acts of empathy and understanding can make a significant difference in the lives of autistic individuals, helping to create a more inclusive and supportive community for all. Here's the original post - Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

  • Much Much Spectrum | South Korean school makes yearbooks blind students can touch, feel

    What happens when school systems stop treating accessibility as an afterthought < Back Disability, Education, Neurodiversity South Korean school makes yearbooks blind students can touch, feel What happens when school systems stop treating accessibility as an afterthought MMS Staff 19 Jan 2026 4-min read Most people remember yearbooks as a visual time capsule. Awkward haircuts, inside jokes in the margins, group photos that prove you belonged to a moment in time. But if you’re blind or visually impaired, yearbooks are often just another reminder that school culture is built around sight, photos, posters, slideshows, and visual noticeboards as the default language of memory. At Daegu Kwangmyung School, a specialized school in South Korea for students with visual impairment, teachers and researchers asked a different question. What if memory didn’t have to be visual at all? Their answer was a 3D-printed yearbook, a graduation album where classmates’ faces appear as raised, tactile relief portraits, designed to be recognized through touch. It’s a small object with a big message: access is the starting point. Yearbooks were never designed for blind students In many school systems, accessibility is still treated like an afterthought, something that gets “accommodated” later, if at all. Blind and visually impaired students are frequently expected to adapt to classrooms that weren’t designed with them in mind: inaccessible learning materials, limited access to diagrams and visual references, and school culture that assumes everyone experiences the world the same way. Yearbooks are a perfect example of that bias. They’re built to be seen, not held. So even when blind students are present in the classroom, the “memory object” that marks the end of school often excludes them from the experience of remembering their peers in the way yearbooks promise everyone else. Inside Daegu Kwangmyung School’s 3D yearbook According to reporting by The Korea Times, graduates from the class of 2021 at Daegu Kwangmyung School received a yearbook containing 3D-printed faces they could explore through touch, along with names embossed in Braille. And the yearbook also included a feature where short recordings of graduation speeches can be played by pressing a button. The portraits were created through a process that included 3D scanning and 3D printing, translating facial features like jawlines, cheekbones, contours into something readable through fingertips. The people behind it: teachers, researchers, and a longer timeline than you’d think The Korea Times reports that the collaboration began in 2019, when the school partnered with Creative Factory, described as a startup incubation center at Kyungpook National University, to create a yearbook specifically for visually impaired students. A teacher at the school, Jeong Moon-jun described yearbooks as special objects that hold memories, and said he wanted his students to have yearbooks made for them. A researcher, Hwang Ung-bi, shared that the project aimed to “remove the bars to new technology,” noting that people with visual impairment can be marginalized as technology evolves and that design should account for the strength of reading by touch. The production was also labor-intensive. The Korea Times reports that teachers and a team of 11 researchers worked for six months to design and produce the yearbook. And importantly, this doesn’t appear to be a one-off. Jeong said the school planned to create an upgraded version for the next graduating class. There are also signs the idea predates the class of 2021. Editorial photo captions from a January 7, 2020 commencement in Daegu describe graduates touching faces in a “3D-printed yearbook.” That suggests the school’s tactile yearbook work has existed in iterations over multiple years. A lot of “inclusive design” still operates like this: build the mainstream version first, then retrofit it for disabled users later, if budget, time, or goodwill allows. This is closer to universal design thinking. Designing products and environments to be usable by the widest range of people, from the start, without requiring special adaptation. The larger issue is when disabled kids are asked to “make do,” every single day It’s tempting to read this story as a feel-good innovation and it is moving. But it also exposes what’s broken. If a tactile yearbook feels revolutionary, it’s because the baseline is so low. Across countries and school systems, disabled children are regularly asked to compromise, to accept partial access, delayed access, or “alternative” experiences that are smaller and lonelier than what non-disabled peers receive. The 3D yearbook refuses the idea that disabled people should only be included in the serious parts of life (education, employment, healthcare), while being excluded from the sentimental, cultural, everyday parts (photos, keepsakes, nostalgia, teenage rituals). If you’re a teacher, school leader, designer, or policymaker reading this, don’t start by asking, “How do we accommodate?” Start by asking, “Who are we leaving out, and why did we think that was acceptable?” Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

  • Much Much Spectrum | Navigating disability, domestic violence & climate crisis in a Delhi slum

    What soaring temperatures, health issues, and systemic neglect can do to those on the margins < Back Climate, Disability, Health Navigating disability, domestic violence & climate crisis in a Delhi slum What soaring temperatures, health issues, and systemic neglect can do to those on the margins Puneet Singh Singhal 20 Jun 2024 5-min read In the narrow, winding lanes of a Delhi slum, where the sun is relentless and the ground is scorched, a story unfolds — one that many will find hard to grasp let alone endure. I grew up in these sweltering corners, living with dyslexia, dyspraxia, and a stammer, all while being the lifeline for my chronically ill mother. We’ve survived domestic violence, yes, but we’re also survivors of an increasingly hostile world — socially, environmentally, and mentally. When environmental crises devastate lives You may read about the heatwaves or monsoon floods, but do you feel them? Can you feel the sweat trickling down your spine as you desperately search for a drop of water? Can you sense the despair, almost tangible, as you watch your mother’s health deteriorate with each passing minute? Living through a Delhi heatwave, in a fragile home with no escape from the oppressive heat, feels like being trapped in an oven. The sun becomes an unforgiving foe, and the air turns into a suffocating shroud. During one unbearable summer, our neighbourhood faced an acute water crisis. Imagine being parched but having not a single drop to drink. Every breath became a laborious task; each moment felt endless. My mother’s existing health issues worsened terribly. Dehydration ravaged her body, while her chronic ailments flared up with newfound intensity. As for me, the heatwaves weren’t just a weather event; they were a neurological, physiological, and psychological disaster. My dyspraxia symptoms intensified, making everyday tasks — like lifting a glass of water — an exhausting struggle. The constant stress and anxiety from watching my mother suffer and feeling helpless to alleviate her pain took a severe toll on my mental health, leading to heightened levels of stress and anxiety. Dealing with a broken healthcare system When you’re fighting to save a loved one’s life while also grappling with disabilities, every second feels like an eternity. The journey to the hospital was a nightmare. Public hospitals were our only hope, but they were dreadful. Doctors and nurses did their best but were woefully under-equipped to handle the flood of patients. Can you fathom the helplessness I felt when I stammered while trying to explain my mother’s rapidly worsening condition? Time and again, I was met with impatient stares or pitying glances, neither of which helped our dire situation. The agony of being trapped in that atmosphere — where you’re just a number, a statistic — is indescribable. The urgent need for climate-resilient, inclusive healthcare Here’s the gut-wrenching truth: if healthcare infrastructure continues to ignore the heightened vulnerabilities of people with disabilities, we’re not just failing as a society; we’re perpetuating suffering and loss. Our healthcare systems need to be fortified with climate-resilient policies and infrastructures. Wheelchair ramps and Braille signage aren’t luxuries; they’re necessities. Doctors need training to understand the unique challenges that environmental disasters pose to individuals with disabilities. It’s not just about ramps and signs; it’s about creating a space where the most vulnerable can feel safe, especially when the world outside is falling apart. Statistics highlighting the impact According to a 2021 climate report heat waves will last 25 times longer 2036 through 2065 in India if emissions push towards a global temperature rise of 4°C under business-as-usual global emission scenarios. The Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change reports that annual heat-related mortality of people older than 65 years is projected to increase by 370% above 1995 – 2014 levels by 2041 – 60 under a scenario compatible with limiting global temperature rise to 2°C, and by 433% under a scenario in which no further mitigation occurs, assuming no further adaptation. By 2081 – 2100, these mortality levels are projected to increase by 683% and 1537% for the two scenarios, respectively. According to this Indian Express article, in Delhi, the world is most likely to temporarily breach the 1.5 degree Celsius limit in the next five years. Each year between 2024 and 2028 is predicted to be between 1.1 degree Celsius and 1.9 degree Celsius higher than the pre-industrial average. Specific healthcare system gaps The public healthcare system in Delhi, and much of India, is severely underfunded. Hospitals often lack essential medical supplies and have insufficient staff to handle patient inflows. For people with disabilities, the challenges are even more pronounced. There are limited provisions for accessible healthcare facilities, and medical staff often lack training in disability-inclusive practices. For instance, during our hospital visits, we encountered long waiting times and inadequate attention to my mother's specific health needs. The lack of air conditioning in many public hospitals exacerbates heat stress for patients and staff alike. Moreover, the absence of accessible communication tools, such as sign language interpreters or text-to-speech devices, creates additional barriers for people with disabilities. Concrete steps for addressing healthcare gaps Investment in infrastructure: Increase funding for public healthcare to improve infrastructure, ensuring hospitals are equipped to handle extreme weather conditions. This includes air conditioning, adequate water supply, and accessible facilities. Training for healthcare professionals: Implement comprehensive training programs for healthcare workers on disability-inclusive practices and climate resilience. Accessible communication: Develop and deploy accessible communication tools in hospitals, such as sign language interpreters and text-to-speech devices, to aid patients with disabilities. Community outreach: Establish community health programs to educate residents about coping mechanisms during extreme weather events and to provide first-response medical aid. Potential measures for climate action Urban planning: Develop urban areas with better heat mitigation strategies, such as green spaces, reflective roofing, and improved water management systems. Early warning systems: Enhance early warning systems for heatwaves and floods to give vulnerable communities ample time to prepare and evacuate if necessary. Sustainable practices: Promote sustainable agricultural and industrial practices to reduce the urban heat island effect and ensure a stable water supply. Policy advocacy: Advocate for policies that prioritise climate resilience in healthcare planning and funding. More than just numbers Statistics can be cold and detached, but stories like mine are filled with raw emotion. The vulnerability, the desperation, the feeling of being caught in an unending cycle of despair — they bring a certain urgency that numbers alone cannot. So here it is, a candid snapshot of what it’s like to live at the devastating intersection of disability and climate-induced healthcare challenges. It’s a cry from the depths of my soul and from the hearts of countless others, who, like my mother and me, are battling more than just social and economic disparities. As we desperately seek solutions for climate change, let’s remember that the first step towards true climate justice is acknowledging and acting upon the exacerbated healthcare challenges faced by the disabled and vulnerable. Let’s strive to build healthcare ecosystems where no one is left to suffer, simply because of who they are or where they come from. The battles we fight today go beyond us; they’re a plea to humanity to wake up, take notice, and act — before it’s too late. Puneet Singh is a disability inclusion advocate and an accessibility professional. He is a person with dyslexia, dyspraxia and stammering. He is the co-founder of Billion Strong, curator of Green Disability and a Bevisioneers fellow. Connect with him on LinkedIn . Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

bottom of page