Search Results

Moving towards a world where we can unmask and take pride in our autistic identity < Back Neurodiversity, News Autistic Pride Day 2024: The significance, history and theme Moving towards a world where we can unmask and take pride in our autistic identity MMS Staff 18 Jun 2024 2-min read Autistic Pride Day is observed annually on June 18. In 2024, this day falls on a Tuesday. This year's theme, ‘Taking the mask off,’ emphasises the importance of mental health and encourages autistic individuals to unmask safely, celebrating and expressing their true selves without conforming to societal expectations. This day promotes a liberating sense of self-acceptance and pride in one's autistic identity. Historical background Autistic Pride Day was initiated in 2005 by Aspies For Freedom (AFF), a group that chose June 18 to honour the birthday of their youngest member at the time. The day was inspired by the ethos of the gay pride movement, with a focus on positivity and acceptance rather than viewing autism as something that needs to be fixed. Kabie Brook, one of the co-founders of Autism Rights Group Highland (ARGH) says that Autistic Pride Day is a grassroots initiative led by autistic people themselves, ensuring that their voices and experiences are front and centre. Significance of the day Autistic Pride Day is not just a celebration but a powerful statement on neurodiversity and the importance of inclusivity. It's a day that challenges misconceptions about autism, advocating for equal rights and opportunities for autistic people. The day serves to educate the public about the lived experiences of autistic individuals and aims to dismantle the stigma surrounding autism. By celebrating this day, we affirm the value and contributions of autistic people, promoting respect, empathy, and an understanding that diversity in thinking and perceiving the world enriches our collective human experience. Celebrations worldwide Every year, Autistic Pride Day is marked by various events that both celebrate autistic culture and promote greater public understanding. Activities range from community gatherings, educational seminars and artistic performances to online campaigns and storytelling sessions. These events serve as a platform for sharing experiences, showcasing the talents of autistic individuals, and reinforcing the community's strength through solidarity and shared identity. How can you celebrate? Whether you're autistic yourself, the loved one of an autistic person, or an ally, you can participate in the celebration. Here are some ways to get involved: Educate yourself and others about the vast diversity within the autistic spectrum. Support autistic voices, seek out books by autistic authors, films by autistic directors, and patronise autistic businesses. Be mindful of light and noise levels in public spaces, and create spaces comfortable for everyone. Some videos you can share to raise awareness and celebrate this day: Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

Chief Justice DY Chandrachud is challenging stereotypes to build an inclusive society < Back Disability, News Supreme Court of India drops guide to respectful disability language Chief Justice DY Chandrachud is challenging stereotypes to build an inclusive society MMS Staff 3 Oct 2024 2-min read As a disabled writer, I have witnessed firsthand how language can shape perceptions, attitudes, and ultimately, the treatment of individuals with disabilities. So, when the Supreme Court of India recently launched a handbook to redefine the conversation around disability, my heart swelled with hope. This isn’t just a legal document; it’s a call to action for all of us to rethink how we speak about disability. Chief Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud emphasised the power of language in the courtroom and beyond, stating that stereotypes and biases can subtly influence legal proceedings at the handbook’s unveiling. This resonates deeply with me and countless others who have faced the brunt of misguided assumptions. How often have we been labelled as “brave” or “heroic” merely for existing? It’s time to dismantle these stereotypes and advocate for language that reflects our humanity, not our limitations. The handbook explicitly discourages derogatory terms like “crippled,” “retard,” and “loony.” These words not only belittle our experiences but also contribute to a culture of stigma. In a society that is often quick to judge, it’s crucial to use language that respects our dignity. It’s a reminder that we are individuals first, with unique stories and identities beyond our disabilities. As someone who has navigated the complexities of living with a disability, I find the emphasis on respectful language refreshing. Chief Justice Chandrachud shared his personal experience with his foster daughters, who were born with a genetic condition. His story highlights the journey that comes with understanding disability on a deeper level. It’s about love, purpose, and a commitment to fostering an inclusive society where every child, regardless of their abilities, is cherished. But the handbook isn’t just about what to say or not to say; it addresses a critical gap in our legal system: data collection. The Chief Justice pointed out that the lack of reliable data on children with disabilities, especially those who have experienced abuse or come into conflict with the law, is a significant challenge. Without accurate data, how can we expect to create effective policies that protect and empower disabled individuals? The call for better data collection is a plea for accountability and meaningful reform. This handbook is a powerful tool for change, but it’s not the end of the road. It’s a stepping stone toward a more inclusive society that values every individual. By encouraging legal professionals, policymakers, and everyday citizens to adopt inclusive terminology, we can change the narrative around disability. The language we use can either uplift or diminish our experiences, and it’s time to choose words that uplift. As we move forward, let’s take this opportunity to engage in conversations about disability that are respectful, informed, and compassionate. The Supreme Court’s initiative is a significant leap toward breaking down barriers and fostering understanding. But it’s up to each of us to carry this message forward, ensuring that our words reflect the dignity and complexity of our lives. Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

Paramjeet Bisht of Uttarakhand practised his race walking only past 9 pm to avoid judgemental onlookers < Back News Youth ridiculed for ‘funny walking style’ represents India at Paris '24 Paramjeet Bisht of Uttarakhand practised his race walking only past 9 pm to avoid judgemental onlookers MMS Staff 3 Aug 2024 1-min read A 23-year-old resident of Uttarakhand - teased by the residents of his village for his ‘funny’ gait - represented India yesterday in the men’s final of the 20-kilometre walk at Paris Olympics 2024. On Thursday, Paramjeet Singh Bisht reportedly finished 37th in the 20 km men’s final where he took part alongside two other Indians - Vikash Singh and Akshdeep Singh. A native of Khalla village in Chamoli district Uttarakhand, Bisht used the roads of his village to practise for the event when they were secluded past 9 pm every day. He wanted to avoid the gaze of the other villagers, who ridiculed him for his ‘funny walking style,’ Bisht has said . “They would often laugh at me... as they were not aware it’s a globally recognised sport.” While Bisht clocked 1 hour, 23 minutes and 48 seconds in the finals, Singh crossed the finish line in 1 hour, 22 minutes and 36 seconds, and Akshdeep pulled out of the race around the 6-kilometre mark. Bisht presently holds the national record for the under-17 and under-19 men’s 5-kilometre walk events. In 2022, he joined the Indian Navy as a senior secondary recruit. “It was a great journey for me,” Bisht simply wrote on his Instagram after the race. Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

Poll says viewers think filmmakers can do more to authentically depict mental illness & disabilities < Back Disability, Media, News Study shows 60 percent audience unhappy with disability representation Poll says viewers think filmmakers can do more to authentically depict mental illness & disabilities MMS Staff 17 Jul 2024 2-min read The verdict is in on Hollywood’s representation of people with disability and mental illness, and the numbers have spoken. According to a new study by the non-profit Inevitable Foundation, cheekily titled ‘Audiences Are Waiting for Hollywood to Greenlight Disability,’ 60 percent of the audience is “unsatisfied with how disability and mental health are currently represented on big screens and small screens alike.” The foundation works with disabled writers and filmmakers to destigmatise disability and mental health, and increase (and level up) the representation of this community. The poll saw 1,000 participants, of which half lived with disabilities and half did not. The study noted that 15 percent of the global population lives with some form of disability or neurodivergence, and when it comes to TV viewing, this population is watching more content than non-disabled or neurotypical audiences. Even so, the polled audience feels the representation is inadequate and improper. “As it stands, the entertainment industry’s drastic underinvestment in authentic disabled storytelling is abandoning an important and growing untapped market and eroding the trust of disabled and non-disabled audiences alike,” the report reads. The poll also shows that 43 percent of the audience comprising both disabled and non-disabled folx ‘frequently discuss or share’ content that has authentic representation of people with disabilities or neurodivergence. And 40 percent are likely to recommend a film or show to friends or family members if it has authentic representation. Recently, the Indian Supreme Court released a set of guidelines for authentic representation of disabled characters, following a Public Interest Litigation filed against the makers of the film ‘Aankh Micholi,’ which had ableist representation. Some other numbers the poll highlights: 25 percent of global households have at least 1 disabled person. 35 percent of disabled people watch 20+ hours of TV per week, compared to 25 percent non-disabled people. 63 percent of disabled people watch more than 10 hours of TV per week, compared to 55 percent of non-disabled people. 31 percent of audiences feel there are no streaming services committed to authentic disability or mental health representation. 25 percent of audiences consider more than 90 percent of the depictions of disability seen in the past year to be inauthentic. 50 percent of Gen Z will research a company to make sure it aligns with their values. Some recent films and shows that have good representation include: Bridgerton Geek Girl All The Light We Cannot See: Check out the full report here . Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

The actor reflects on overcoming health challenges just before becoming a father < Back Health, Media Mark Ruffalo reveals terrifying dream that turned out to be true The actor reflects on overcoming health challenges just before becoming a father MMS Staff 30 Sept 2024 2-min read Mark Ruffalo is no stranger to overcoming challenges, both on and off screen. Known for his powerful performances and kind, grounded personality, his fans admire him as an actor and father. But few know Ruffalo’s life took a terrifying turn more than 20 years ago when he faced an unexpected battle with his health — one that started with a dream. During a recent conversation on the Smartless podcast, Ruffalo shared a story about a dream he had had. Just before his wife Sunrise Coigney was about to give birth to their first child, he dreamt that he had a brain tumour. Ruffalo shares that in the dream, there were no images, no voices — just an overwhelming sense of clarity. Incidentally, at the time Ruffalo had an ear infection. But this dream wasn’t something he could shake off. He says his intuition told him to get checked, just in case. Incidentally, a scan revealed that the dream wasn’t just a dream — it was a warning. Ruffalo had a tumour the size of a golf ball behind his left ear. With their son Keen on the way, Ruffalo pondered whether to tell his wife about the tumour or keep quiet about it until after the birth. Ruffalo chose the latter. “She had the birth plan, she did the yoga, she had the doula, we had a hot tub ordered,” he said, reflecting on his wife’s preparations. “This is like her wedding… and I was just like, ‘I can’t.’’ A week after Keen’s birth, Ruffalo finally told his wife about the tumour. Her initial reaction was disbelief — she thought he was joking. But the gravity of the situation soon hit, and she broke down. Thankfully, the tumour was benign, but the road ahead wasn’t without its fair share of risks. Ruffalo faced a 20 percent chance of facial paralysis and a 70 percent chance of losing his hearing in the left ear. Post surgery, Ruffalo woke up permanently deaf in his left ear. His face, initially paralyzed, slowly regained movement over the course of a year. More importantly, he was alive, able to be there for his family. Stories like this remind us that even our heroes face struggles behind the scenes. Today, Ruffalo continues to give his fans more and more reason to adore him not just as a brilliant actor but as a person who faced his most difficult moments with grace and courage. Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

What to say (and what not to say) when your friend discovers they’re neurodivergent < Back Neurodiversity 4 ways to validate someone coming out to you about their neurodivergence What to say (and what not to say) when your friend discovers they’re neurodivergent MMS Staff 2 Aug 2024 3-min read Autism and ADHD diagnoses rates around the world have risen considerably over the past few years. More and more people are finding out they’re neurodivergent. Which means it’s not entirely unlikely you may come across someone you know - maybe a friend, colleague or acquaintance - who has either recently been diagnosed (or discovered), or will at some point in the future. If you know someone who’s just been diagnosed (or discovered), read on below. And if not yet, read on still, because this is good information to have. First up, you definitely want to avoid saying things like, “Oh., everyone’s neurodivergent now,” or “It’s become a trend,” or “You can’t be autistic because of XYZ reason,” or - our absolute favourite (read: NOT), “But you don’t look autistic!” These just don’t help, even if you say it jokingly, because, for a lot of people, their neurodivergence discovery is already a bit overwhelming to begin with. You kind of don’t know what to make of it, and hearing things such as these aren’t going to help. Plus impostor syndrome is BIG in the neurodivergent world (if you don’t know about it, read up on it here ). Instead, try the following: If they seem unsure about it: “This doesn't change anything about the person you are, only about what you thought you knew about yourself all along. At least now you know...” Always helps to be affirming, and let them know that nothing changes. Sure they now have the added hyper-awareness about their triggers and glimmers, and some changes they might need to make in their day-to-day lifestyle. But the people who care for them will stick around no matter what. If you’ve always thought they might be autistic: “ I’ve kind of suspected that for a while. Thanks for letting me know. ” While it’s generally not a good idea to tell an undiscovered/ undiagnosed person they might be neurodivergent if they haven’t brought it up with you first, depending on the circumstances it might be okay to let them know you’ve wondered whether they were neurodivergent due to a past incident. Soon after a realisation/ diagnosis, neurodivergent people might tend to think back on past experiences and wonder if they went the way they did because of their different wiring. Bringing up past incidents might help them have realisations that help prepare them for the future. If you don’t have the slightest idea what being neurodivergent or getting a diagnosis means, try going with: “I’m sorry I don’t know much about that. Could you tell me more about it?” Sure, a lot of us might have heard about or even come across terms such as ADHD, autism, dyslexia, dyspraxia, etc in passing on the Internet. Trouble is, the Internet is replete with misinformation on these conditions. It’s best to read accounts of neurodivergent people while trying to learn more about neurodiversity. And if you’re still unsure, the classic: “I’m sorry, could you tell me more...” approach always works. And if they’re happy about it: “Congratulations! This must feel so freeing. If you want to talk about it, I’m here.” Depending on the circumstances, a person’s discovery can be very liberating. It’s like finding all the answers to a bunch of very difficult questions. While it’s generally a good idea to congratulate them and share in their happiness, it’s also important to realise that you need to give them space to make sense of it. A good way to do that is by letting them know that if they want to talk to you about it, you’re around. Remember that this can be a confusing and challenging time for many who neurodivergents, especially those who have had experiences with bullying, exclusion, social isolation, and infantilisation. The time it takes to come to terms with accepting your neurodivergence may differ with every person, but it’s important to know that having someone around who understands is always helpful. So be there for your loved one, let them know that you care, and, if they’re keen on it, help them connect with other neurodivergent folx. There’s quite nothing like community :) Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

A show about murder, misogyny, and the men our boys are becoming < Back Gender, Education, Parenting The truth behind Adolescence, Netflix's new crime drama A show about murder, misogyny, and the men our boys are becoming Aditi Gangrade 7 Apr 2025 3-min read At first glance, Adolescence, Netflix’s new crime mini-series, looks like your standard whodunnit. A teenage girl is murdered. A teenage boy is arrested. We follow the fallout. But to reduce this show to a thriller about finding a killer is to miss its sharpest, most haunting truth. Adolescence isn’t a story about one violent boy. It’s a story about a violent system. About the schools, families, algorithms, governments, and silences that raised him. At the centre of Adolescence is 13-year-old Jamie — awkward, isolated, and slowly radicalised by a cocktail of neglect, toxic masculinity, and the internet’s darkest corners. He’s not an evil genius. He’s not even “bad.” He’s a kid. A kid raised in a home where power = manhood. In a school where bullying goes unnoticed and gender roles go unchallenged. And online, where influencers, and endless reels are teaching him that women are objects, weakness is failure, and violence is sometimes justified. The scariest part is that nothing about Jamie felt far-fetched. It felt familiar. This isn’t just happening “out there” As a woman in India, this hit close. Because we know this boy. We’ve seen him mocking his teachers. We’ve seen him online, saying “feminism has gone too far.” We’ve sat across the table from him, while adults — even women — excused his entitlement as “Boys will be boys.” We’ve seen how girls are trained to protect themselves from boys. But no one’s training boys to respect girls. Adolescence captures this divide in brutal detail — not just the physical violence, but the emotional breakdown of a society that rewards silent aggression in boys and constant self-policing in girls. Parenting isn't enough. It never was. Here’s the truth that often gets brushed aside: This isn’t just about parenting. Yes, parents play a big role. But children spend most of their time being shaped by everything else — schools, peers, gaming chatrooms, TV, TikTok, the government policies (or lack thereof) around sex education, digital safety, and gender rights. It’s not enough to tell parents to "monitor screen time." We need schools that actively teach consent and emotional intelligence, not just math. We need tech platforms to stop pushing toxic content to young boys in the name of “engagement.” We need governments to fund programs that challenge misogyny, rather than quietly enabling it. We need a whole system shift — not just better parenting books. It’s about the boys and the girls One of the most uncomfortable truths in Adolescence is that Katie — the girl Jamie is accused of killing — was also part of the cycle. She bullied him. She mocked him using the same incel language the internet gave her. Because when you live in a world that’s always teaching girls to perform toughness and boys to perform dominance — even the victims start playing along. There are no neat lines here. And that’s what makes the show so hard to watch — and so necessary. We don’t need more strong daughters. We need kinder sons. We’ve told girls to speak up, defend themselves, “be bold.” Now it’s time we start telling boys that strength isn’t about silence, or power, or control. That it’s okay to cry. That it’s good to be kind. That respect isn’t a favour, it's basic. And to do that, we need to give them real role models — not just alpha male influencers or “nice guys” with entitlement issues. We need teachers, uncles, coaches, politicians, fathers — and yes, even boys raised by strong women — to show them that masculinity can look like care. The real question isn't who killed Katie. It’s what killed all of them? What killed Jamie’s empathy? What killed Katie’s compassion? What killed our ability to see the signs? We won’t fix this with one campaign or one conversation. But we can start naming the systems that are failing our kids — and start building new ones. Because Adolescence doesn’t just show us what happened. It warns us what’s coming. Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

Tech leaders push for merit-based policies, but at what cost to diversity and innovation? < Back Work, News, Gender The MEI vs DEI debate: Is this a step back for inclusion Tech leaders push for merit-based policies, but at what cost to diversity and innovation? MMS Staff 30 Jun 2024 4-min read ‘Scale is a meritocracy and we must always remain one.’ Tech entrepreneur Alexandr Wang posted on X last week saying his company Scale AI was replacing DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion) with ‘MEI.’ MEI, Wang added, stands for merit, excellence, intelligence. ‘Talent is our #1 input metric,’ the founder said. Unsurprisingly, Tesla CEO Elon Musk applauded Wang on the move. “Great!” Musk responded, in a reply to Wang. Musk wasn’t alone in the list of company heads congratulating Wang on the move; Sequoia partner Shaun Maguire and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong hopped onto the appreciation bandwagon as well. Musk and plenty other leaders have been more than vocal about their dislike for DEI. In a post on X earlier, Musk had said: “DEI is just another word for racism. Shame on anyone who uses it.” Alarmingly, there’s a growing community of people actively in support of MEI over DEI. What this community gets wrong is that DEI does not mean prioritising diversity while ignoring other qualifications. Ironically, Wang’s post ends up lending credence to the very cornerstone of DEI hiring. “There are a lot of things in this post that are actually, perhaps surprisingly, aligned with the goals of a lot of DEI practitioners,” said Natalie Johnson, cofounder and managing director of strategy at DEI consulting firm Paradigm, in this story on Fortune. “I think for many, many years now, we have failed to recognize that and have failed to make that connection that, oftentimes, we have the same values, the same principles, that we’re building off of.” Speaking of diversity, in the AI industry alone, women make up just 30% of global roles. This is especially concerning considering how many Large Learning Models (LLMs) have biases in-built because of the lack of diversity within the teams working on them. Ranking high among AI’s biases is gender bias. The Artificial Intelligence and Gender Equality report by UN Women has identified a clear gender gap in access to the Internet, which manifests in the gender bias in AI. This study by the Berkeley Haas Center for Equity, Gender and Leadership analysed 133 AI systems across different industries and found that 44 per cent of them showed gender bias and 25 per cent both gender and racial bias. If AI is trained on data that is biassed, a natural consequence is it will learn and internalise that bias and incorporate it in the results it throws up. And gender bias is not the only kind AI perpetuates. Recently AI also came under fire for discriminating against people with disabilities by ranking CVs of disabled people lower than able-bodied people. DEI policies are put in place not only to ensure the right representation among the workforce but also to make sure every voice is heard, every person has a level playing field, and decision-making is fair and just. As Lisa Simon, chief economist at analytics platform Revelio Labs rightly puts it: “...as soon as you remove (DEI policies), people go back to hiring people that look like them.” Bias and discrimination are the prime reasons DEI came into being in the 1960s . Since then, companies have made significant strides in diversifying their workforce through internal policy reforms and structural changes in their hiring & talent development processes. Lots of data has emerged over time that shows how effective DEI boosts innovation , leads to higher revenues and results in greater employee satisfaction. There is also ample data to show that a large percentage of employees who are dissatisfied by ‘non-inclusive workplaces’ plan to quit within 12 months. And that is the fundamental issue with placing MEI over DEI - a less diverse team means a more homogenous outlook of the world, which severely limits the potential of both artificial intelligence as well as human teams, both of which are crucial in ensuring organisational success in today’s day and age. Not to mention rallying against DEI invisibilises the lived experiences of people who have been systemically marginalised, and denies them the opportunity to present their perspectives to the world. It ensures that systemic oppression is never weeded out. If the pushback against DEI goes on, AI-powered technology and services will evolve to be severely deficient of diverse perspectives. The teams in our workplaces will homogenise and innovation might come to a complete standstill. The gap will consequently result in a lower quality of services as well as biassed decisions about jobs, credit, health care and more. What are your thoughts about the DEI vs MEI debate? Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

Abhishek Singh awarded Man of the Match, Sai Akash bags Player of the Series < Back News, Disability Indian Deaf cricket team beats England in bilateral T20 series Abhishek Singh awarded Man of the Match, Sai Akash bags Player of the Series MMS Staff 3 Jul 2024 2-min read Only a couple of days ago did India win the international T20 World Cup. And the entire nation erupted in celebration. Streets were filled with cheers and celebration, and fireworks lit up the sky. And yet, when the Indian Deaf Cricket Team had achieved their historic victory just two days earlier, there was complete silence. On June 27, the Indian Deaf Cricket Team emerged victorious at the County Ground, Leicester in the bilateral series against England. They beat the English Men’s Deaf Cricket team by 5 - 2 in a 7-match series. The Indian team’s success is a moment of celebration for the entire nation, marking another milestone in the journey of Indian cricket. The men in blue continue to inspire, paving the way for future generations of D/ deaf cricketers. The Indian team dominated the series, defeating the hosts in the final match by six wickets. In the finals, India - electing to bowl - restricted England to 164 for 4 and then chased down the target with four balls to spare, riding on half-centuries by Abhishek (68) and Umar Ashraf (56). Despite not having the best of starts losing the first three wickets for only 46 runs, Abhishek and Ashraf’s 95-run partnership rebuilt the innings and took the side over the line. Abhishek Singh was awarded Man of the Match, while Sai Akash Man of the Series. Captain Virender Singh took the maximum wickets. Speaking on this achievement, Sumit Jain, President of the Indian Deaf Cricket Association (IDCA), said, “The victory in this bilateral series against England is not just a win on the field but a testament to the dedication and skill of our hearing-impaired players. It marks a significant milestone for deaf cricket in India, showcasing our capability to compete and succeed at the highest levels of the sport.” The series win underscores the growing talent and potential within the D/ deaf cricketing community. Roma Balwani, CEO of IDCA, said, “I am thrilled by India’s historic triumph against England in the bilateral series. This victory underscores our team’s commitment to excellence in cricket." The team’s achievements highlight the importance of inclusivity in sports and demonstrate that with the right opportunities and support, athletes can excel at the highest levels. Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS

Former Chief Justice opens up about how most Indian homes remain unfit for disabled people < Back Disability, News, Parenting India isn’t built for the Disabled — DY Chandrachud Former Chief Justice opens up about how most Indian homes remain unfit for disabled people MMS Staff 19 Apr 2025 3-min read When the 50th Chief Justice of India Dr DY Chandrachud recently spoke about his struggle to find an accessible home for his daughters with disabilities, it wasn’t just a personal anecdote, it was a national wake-up call. Speaking at a recent event on disability rights, Chandrachud said, “We have two beautiful daughters who are children with special needs. But every house we go to is just not equipped for a family with disabled members.” Chandrachud, who must vacate his official residence by April 30, shared that his family has been actively searching for a home to rent. But the options, even in India’s capital, are startlingly inaccessible. “We saw a lovely house today,” he said. “But the rooms were at different levels, separated by a step. And the landlord said, ‘I’ll put a wooden ramp,’ not realising that accessibility isn’t just about connecting Level 0 to Level 1. It’s much more.” When the system fails the system The irony is hard to miss. Here is one of the most powerful men in India’s judiciary, someone who has presided over landmark rulings on disability rights, now confronting the very barriers he has spent years trying to dismantle. If Chandrachud and his family are facing these obstacles, what about the millions of Indians with disabilities who lack the same influence, resources, or legal knowledge? A country still not built for disabled people India passed the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act (RPWD) in 2016. The law mandates accessibility in buildings, transport, communication, and digital services. But implementation has lagged. Budget allocations remain inadequate, and public and private infrastructures alike continue to ignore basic design standards. Where they exist, accessible infrastructure is patchy. Ramps, if present, are often too steep. Elevators are missing or non-functional. Tactile paving is placed in arbitrary directions. Toilets are not usable for wheelchair users. And in most Indian homes, steps at the entrance or inside rooms make independent living nearly impossible. The issue is not a lack of laws but a lack of will, societal understanding, and inclusive design. From the courtroom to the community To be clear, Chandrachud is no stranger to the disability rights movement. As Chief Justice, he delivered the 2017 judgment in the Rajiv Rathod case, directing states to draft comprehensive accessibility plans. He also established the Supreme Court Accessibility Committee in 2022, and released the Supreme Court’s Disability Handbook in 2023, guiding judges on disability-inclusive jurisprudence. At the event, he emphasised that law alone is not enough. “Courts can only go so far,” he said. “There must be incentives — like tax benefits — for accessible design. And there should be monetary sanctions, not criminal ones, for non-compliance.” He also addressed the need for empathy-led judiciary reforms, supporting the idea of benches that understand disability rights, even if not exclusively dedicated to them. Who designs for whom? India’s cities — its homes, schools, airports, parks, courts, and buses — are largely designed for the non-disabled. For the 26.8 million disabled people in India (as per Census 2011, though estimates are likely much higher), the world outside is often a series of closed doors. And while accessibility is often painted as a “special need,” it is, in fact, a universal need. An elderly person recovering from surgery, a parent pushing a stroller, a delivery worker carrying heavy loads... everyone benefits from barrier-free design. A moment of reckoning That it took a former Chief Justice’s personal housing struggle to reignite this conversation says something about the invisibilisation of disabled voices in public discourse. The path forward Chandrachud concluded with a note of quiet urgency: “Disability law cuts across the whole of society. It’s not like insolvency law, which requires niche expertise. What it requires is understanding and design that respects dignity.” Until then, the former Chief Justice — and millions of disabled Indians — will keep encountering steps where there should have been bridges. Much much relate? Share it now! WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Copy link < Back SHORTS